Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<October 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

More Links










# Monday, October 05, 2009
Not So Deep Thoughts: Setting The Record Straight On The Favre Saga
Posted by Tuff Stuff

It's hard to believe it's only been 48 days since Brett Favre shocked the world and signed with the Minnesota Vikings. The amazing amount of media attention that followed lies somewhere between the O.J. trial and 9/11. Obviously, Favre donning the uniform of the Packers' arch rival for a game against his former teammates pales in comparison to murder and terrorism, but you wouldn't know it based on the amount of hype spinning out of control in the Wisconsin-Minnesota (and nationwide to a lesser degree) area as of late.

In the midst of all the "coverage" and "analysis" leading up to tonight's Minnesota-Green Bay game at the Metrodome, several interesting (actually, several might be pushing it) perspectives have come to my attention that I wasn't previously aware of. favrebfc.jpg

While listening to (far too much) sports talk radio and reading comments from long-time Packers fans, I have learned that while it couldn't be farther from the truth, a large percentage of green-and-gold fans (and I'm assuming non-Packer fans as well) still believe that Packers GM Ted Thompson forced Favre out of Green Bay. Really people? Really?

For those who didn't follow the saga closely for the last four-plus years, let me try and clear it up as simply as I can without all the messy timelines and he-said, he-said accusations that have muddled up the picture.

The Favre retirement talk began in earnest after the 2005 season when the Packers fired Mike Sherman and hired Mike McCarthy. The hire signaled the start of what appeared to be a rebuilding project in Green Bay, as the new coach along with GM Ted Thompson looked to get younger via the draft. An aging Favre contemplated retirement at the time, not because he didn't feel he could still compete, but because at age 35, he wondered if the team could supply him with the tools necessary to make another title run. Favre realized that because of his age and the general wear and tear accumulated after 12-plus seasons in the NFL, he could no longer carry a team on his back and make an average supporting cast Super Bowl ready.

At that point, with Favre hinting more and more seriously about retirement, the Packers began to groom 2005 first-round pick, Aaron Rodgers, as the aire apparent to Favre while trying to build for their future. The team threw Favre a couple bones by selecting receivers Greg Jennings and James Jones in the 2006 draft and running backs Brandon Jackson and DeShawn Wynn the following year. The retirement talk would subside after each draft only to have it resurface every January, with Favre seemingly inching closer to calling it a career each offseason from 2005 until 2008 when he left for good.

While the whole point of this blog is to set the record straight and disprove the theory that Thompson is at fault for Favre's departure, by no means was Thompson without blame. After finishing the 2006 campaign 8-8 and missing the playoffs, Favre first became irked with management after the team failed to acquire Randy Moss from Oakland. The Patriots landed the talented receiver for a 4th-round pick in the draft and Favre felt Thompson and company should've made a bigger push to get him the true weapon he'd been lacking.

Thompson's young receivers (Jennings and Jones) stepped up big in 2007 (14 TDs and nearly 1,000 yards) and all was forgotten, as Favre posted one of the best seasons of his career and the young Packers finished a surprising 13-3 and came within one Favre interception of taking on the unbeaten Patriots in the Super Bowl. Two months (March) later after leaving the Packers in limbo about his status for the 2008 season, Favre officially announced his retirement, citing he was "mentally drained" and could no longer play at the level he was accustomed to.

Because he had waffled with this decision several times previously, the Packers management asked Favre if he had changed his mind prior to the draft in April and Favre reiterated that he was in fact staying retired. So the team looked to build for the future via the draft and selected two quarterbacks in the in the 2008 draft assuming Favre would stay true to his word.

In July of 2008, Favre apparently got the itch to come out of retirement and play again. He intentionally leaked the story to ESPN's Chris Mortenson to gauge the Packers' interest of a possible return. It was at this time where matters became a little murky and the facts became a little cloudy. In the time between March and July, Green Bay handed over the reigns to Aaron Rodgers and prepared for Rodgers to be their starter. When the Packers informed Favre that because of what he had previously told them in March, they had moved on. Because he had now put them in a terrible position (both from a PR standpoint and a team unity perspective) with his constant indecision, the Packers half-heartedly told Favre to come into camp and compete with Rodgers for the starting quarterback job. At that point, Favre's feelings and ego were bruised to such a degree by this perceived lack of support that he vowed to never return to the Packers and set forth an agenda that would ultimately lead us to where we are today.

For all the Thompson haters out there, riddle me this: If you've gone out of your way to accommodate a player to the degree that the team did with Favre for so many years and then he tells that he is 100 percent certain he's walking away from the game, how can you not start to move on and plan for a future without him? The Green Bay Packers are a team of 80 players and no successful team can let the fate of 79 others be held hostage by the indecisions of one lone player no matter how great he might be. Thompson and the Packers pampered (perhaps even coddled and enabled) Favre like many other teams have pampered aging legends in the past and afforded him the opportunity to regain his starting status and allow them to save face at the same time but his ego got in the way and the soap opera began.

After examining all of the facts and listening to both sides of the story, it's clear what happened. Favre ultimately wasn't welcomed back the way he felt a legend should be and his ego wouldn't allow him to understand the Packers had no other alternative than to handle things the way they did. Say for argument's sake that Thompson and the Packers rolled out the welcome wagon once again when Favre changed his mind. They tell Rodgers 'sorry, but we have to accommodate this guy because of all he's done for this franchise.' Favre comes back, plays well, but hangs up the cleats for good at season's end and they turn to the oft-jilted Rodgers to take over as team leader and quarterback of the now and of the future. My guess is Rodgers and many of his teammates already in his corner lose all faith in management and team chemistry, unity and cohesiveness go out the window.

When Favre told the Packers in July of 2008 that he was unequivocally retired, all bets were off and the team switched gears and began its journey in a new direction. Feeling disrespected and underappreciated, Favre set in motion a plan to ultimately make the team, and Thompson in  particular, pay for their decision.

So here we are, just hours away from the first showdown between Favre's old team and his new one. I, like many others, wished it all could've been avoided but it is what it is and hopefully all of the Favre haters and all of the Thompson haters can put the drama behind us and root for a game that lives up to the incredible hype. Maybe that will be easier now that they better understand the facts behind the drama. I for one don't like how things played out but I do understand each side's actions and reactions and that makes it more tolerable as of fan of both Brett Favre and the Green Bay Packers. Hopefully it will have the same effect on some of the haters as well.

 





Monday, October 05, 2009 10:03:32 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #  Comments [0]