Bill Russell once said something to the effect of, regarding autographs, that those get these autographs now think they know you or have a piece of you when they get the autograph. He felt it was quite impersonal, which probably led to his stance against autographs for so many years.

I'm not of the opinion that getting an autograph means you own a piece of the person or "know" them. I think it's a memento from them and nothing more. It's different if you can have a lengthy conversation with an athlete to get a true sense of the person – then you might be able to say you know of them based on your experience.

Russell said he'd prefer a handshake and to look in someone's eye than scribble a signature and hand it over. Heck, I think collectors would like that, too. Too often you hear about athletes who don't look up when signing, refuse to sign or are surly when doing anything with the public. If people had the choice, I think they'd prefer to have a conversation with a favorite athlete than simply be shuffled through a line like cattle.

Of course, the problem is that you rarely get that opportunity, and that is why people go the autograph route instead.

If I had the chance to talk to an athlete for a length of time, I'd choose Hank Aaron first. He trials on and off the field and experiences playing the game would be a true treat to listen.

Anyone else have a favorite athlete they'd just like to talk to?