Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| May, 2008 (1) |
| April, 2008 (1) |
| March, 2008 (3) |
| February, 2008 (5) |
| January, 2008 (5) |
| December, 2007 (3) |
| November, 2007 (6) |
| October, 2007 (7) |
| September, 2007 (10) |
| August, 2007 (7) |
Search
Archives
| | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|
| 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 1 | | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
More Links
|
 Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Selling Your Cards Won't Guarantee Riches
Posted by tuff
NOTE: This is from my column that appeared in the Aug. 17 issue of SPORTS COLLECTORS DIGEST. Reader Brett Craig saw this and thought it might be of interest to some of our readers.
Just about anyone who collects sports cards is aware to some degree of the so-called “book value” of their items, even collectors who say they collect purely for the fun of the hobby. If you enjoy the emotional connection that you have with your card collection, never start to wonder what your cards might be worth. The moment you look at your collection as a revenue source, they lose their sentimental appeal and become a commodity. Worse yet, they’re a commodity that has no intrinsic value, meaning selling them can be a bigger challenge than most people realize. The reality is that the bulk of most people’s card collections are made up of iems that aren’t necessarily extremely valuable or rare. That realization comes to some people when they decide to try to sell off some or all of their collections. Most “novice” collectors believe that when it’s time to sell their cards, they simply have to bring in their boxload(s) of items to the nearest card show or dealer and cash them in. I can’t tell you the number of dealers who tell me they get calls on a regular basis from someone who had a collection of cards “from several years back” and wants the dealer to buy it from them. The dealer eventually learns that what the person has is a box full of unorganized cards from the late 1980s and early 1990s that aren’t valuable or scarce. They decline the customer’s offer, or offer them a bulk rate such as 25 cents per pound. Needless to say, some customers are left feeling a bit deflated. But how many 1990 Fleer Baseball sets or Jose Canseco rookies did they really think the dealer needed? Dealers will certainly buy things they think they can resell, but they will only pay a portion of what they think they can sell it for. And if they can’t resell it, why should they be under any obligation to buy it? Collectors now have the option of liquidating cards on their own via eBay or other online avenues. Again, what some soon realize is that some cards will only generate a fraction of what they had hoped they would. In fact, some people who try to sell bulk lots of cards will find out the cost of shipping those cards is sometimes more than what the cards will sell for. So is card collecting nothing more than a scam, with trumped-up book values designed to lure customers into making a purchase? Of course not. Card collecting is a hobby, and hobbies are meant to provide entertainment. There are examples of cards that sell for a lot of money. There are examples of cards that are worth less today than a few years ago. That’s the case in any collectibles hobby. If you’re going to get involved in the collectibles market purely to “buy low, sell high” you’ve got to do your homework and know which items will bring top dollar. It can be done, but be prepared: When a hobby turns into a business, it isn’t always as much fun as it used to be.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:28:42 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
 Monday, August 13, 2007
I must be hip if I have a blog
Posted by tuff
Welcome to the world premiere of my blog (in card collecting terms, I guess this would be my rookie blog). Since I’m new to this blogging thing, I can’t promise what, exactly, you’ll find in here on a regular basis. But my goal is to use this to bring you some insight on interesting things going on in the sports collectibles market. I’ll do my best to make it worth your while to check out this blog on a regular basis. And, as always, it’s a good place for you to share your feedback.
Monday, August 13, 2007 8:19:13 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
Upper Deck buying Topps?
Posted by tuff
Let’s start with what has the potential to be the biggest story in the card collecting hobby in at least 25 years. Upper Deck is involved in a hostile takeover attempt of Topps. Here’s a quick recap of what’s happened so far (warning: the following contains official Wall Street-type talk that people with no interest in the business world can find either overwhelming or quite boring). Back in March, Topps announced it had agreed to sell the company to a pair of private equity firms headed up by Michael Eisner. The sale price was $386 million, or $9.75 per share of Topps stock. Even though the deal was approved by Topps’ board of directors, it has to be approved by the majority of its shareholders. A vote was originally scheduled for June, but has since been rescheduled for Aug. 30. In May, Upper Deck put a competing offer on the table for Topps valued at $10.75 per share. Topps didn’t believe the Upper Deck offer was better for its shareholders than the $9.75-per-share offer for a variety of reasons, so Upper Deck took the offer straight to the shareholders. They launched a tender offer in which they would pay shareholders $10.75 for every share they turned over to Upper Deck. This is why it’s known as a “hostile takeover,” because they did so despite the objection of the Topps board. Topps had said that one of the problems with Upper Deck’s offer was the potential it could be shot down by the government for antitrust concerns, but earlier this month the government issued no objections to the deal. Topps then issued a statement suggesting Upper Deck had told them they might not have financial backing to pull off the acquisition. Upper Deck responded with a press release of its own, accusing Topps of trying to deceive shareholders into voting for an inferior offer. Here’s where things stand as of this writing. Upper Deck’s offer to buy shares at $10.75 expires on Aug. 29. The company says that as of Aug. 10, it had acquired about 30 percent of the outstanding shares. On Aug. 30, Topps’ shareholders will vote on the deal from Eisner’s group. If they approve that deal, Upper Deck loses out. If the Eisner deal is rejected, Upper Deck will have the only offer for shareholders to consider. If Upper Deck buys Topps, it has said it will merge the two companies, meaning that Topps cards would be produced by Upper Deck. But how many Topps products the company would be allowed to produce will be decided by the licensing bodies (i.e., Major League Baseball, the NFL, etc.). Needless to say, this is a story that could have a significant impact on the future of the card market. We’ll continue to post the latest developments on the website.
Monday, August 13, 2007 8:15:45 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
|
|
|