Earlier this year, the NBA sponsored a promotion for hobby stores in which the shop that collected the most wrappers from packs of basketball cards would win a store makeover. The makeover itself would be engineered by designer Michael Moloney, a name you might recognize if you ever watch the ABC series "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition."

The winning store was SMP Sportscards in Grapevine, Texas. In August, the store underwent its transformation. The owner of the store, Scott Pierce, was not allowed in the store for a week while Moloney and a crew of about a dozen people moved out the inventory, remodeled the store and gave it a whole new look.

The NBA has put together a quick video recap of the process. Since there's no narration, here's what you'll see on the video: It begins with some "before" photos of the store, then you'll see Moloney working in the store after its been gutted. Most of the second half of the video is shot when Pierce returns to the store for the first time and takes a tour with Moloney, some of Pierce's family and friends, and former NBA great Spud Webb, who attended the event and signed autographs for Pierce's customers. Needless to say, everyone was impressed by the final results.

To see the video, click here.

As a lifelong fan of the Green Bay Packers, I know that I’ll never
forget watching Brett Favre throw that touchdown pass to Greg Jennings against the Minnesota Vikings to break Dan Marino’s all-time record for career touchdown passes. It was the latest in a long list of memorable moments from Favre’s tremendous career.

What I probably won’t remember after a few years is just how many touchdown passes it took to break that record – 420-something, wasn’t it?

Most NFL fans knew Marino had the career record for TD passes before Favre, and most people will know that Favre holds the record until someone else gets on the doorstep of breaking it. Do you remember who held the record before Marino? Don’t feel bad if you’re stammering trying to spit out Fran Tarkenton. That’s the simple nature of NFL records.

The longest hitting streak in baseball history? Everybody knows Joe DiMaggio hit in 56 straight. Hank Aaron eclipsed Babe Ruth’s all-time home-run record 33 years ago, and yet most fans remember Ruth’s mark stood at 714 and Aaron eventually reached 755.

Baseball’s all-time hit leader? Pete Rose. The last person to hit .400 in a season? Ted Williams, of course. Most RBIs in a season? That would be Hack Wilson’s 191 in 1930.

Baseball’s most amazing statistics are practically burned into the minds of even casual baseball fans. Even if you don’t know them, get a small group of baseball fans together, and they can probably quote most of them without a record book in sight.

Football’s most amazing statistics are just as amazing, but far less easy to memorize. The NFL’s all-time rushing leader? Emmitt Smith, even though his mark of 18,355 yards doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue. Most career touchdowns? It probably took you a minute or two before you remembered Jerry Rice’s name, let alone the fact he racked up 208.

Considering how popular football is in this country, it’s somewhat surprising that some of the game’s most impressive statistical accomplishments aren’t as well known as they are in baseball.

That might also explain, to some extent, why baseball has a larger collector base than football. Baseball is a game that has been measured by statistical accomplishments for decades, and a player’s stature in the game is measured more by his numbers than anything else.

I know Favre’s achievements will be remembered by fans, especially Packers fans, for many years to come – even if his exact numbers might not be.

In an episode of "Seinfeld," Jerry is nervous about having to take a lie
detector test. George tells Jerry how he's been able to lie his way through
many situations over the years by following one simple philosophy: "It's not
a lie if you believe it."

That must be the same philosophy used over the years by the on-air
personalities who are asked to sell sports cards on Shop At Home TV. Sometimes the things they say to sell cards are so ridiculous, you have to assume they truly believe it. Otherwise, nobody in their right mind could make these claims (at least not with a straight face).

I had not seen cards for sale on Shop At Home for several years, primarily because I avoid all home shopping networks. But last Saturday, I accidentally flipped past the Shop At Home channel and was stopped by the offer of the hour: a collection of cards and items depicting at least 50 Hall of Famers for $99.99 (plus another $10 or so for shipping).

I only watched this segment for about 10 minutes, but that's all it took to hear some remarkable claims. For instance, the headline item in this collection was an autographed Steve Carlton first-day cover. The hosts immediately proclaimed that this item alone was worth the $100 price for the whole collection.

Truth be told, an item like this is probably worth $25-$30.

The other big-ticket items in this lot included George Brett and Robin Yount rookie cards, both graded "10" by Beckett. That would be pretty cool if those were the Topps rookie cards of these Hall of Famers, but instead, the cards were from the far less popular (and unlicensed) SSPC set.

Again, the hosts proclaimed that these cards together were worth the $100 price tag. Again, they would be wrong because the book value for the cards is about $7 each.

Now, they were correct that the cards were graded 10 by Beckett, but this 10 was by Beckett's lower-priced Collectors Club Grading, and a BCCG 10 only means the card is "Mint or better." It doesn't carry the same premium as a 10 from the standard Beckett grading service.

They also promised cards of 50 "current or future Hall of Famers," which I don't doubt was accurate. Although most of the cards I saw pictured were mid-1990s cards of guys like Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa, and few of the cards I saw would be considered premium cards.

Consumers who purchase items from TV shopping networks are generally being coaxed to make an impulse purchase. If they pay more than what they could find the same items for elsewhere, well, that's their own fault. In this case, I'm not sure consumers would have been getting "ripped off" in terms of what they were paying, but by no means were they getting several hundred dollars worth of items as the hosts were suggesting.